A Spanish commercial court has ruled that Ryanair engaged in unfair competition and defamation against eDreams ODIGEO, one of Europe’s largest online travel companies.
The judgment, issued by the Commercial Court No. 3 of Barcelona, marks the third time Ryanair has been ordered to stop making false claims about eDreams services and pricing. This latest legal setback for the airline reinforces previous decisions made in both 2017 and 2023.
The court found that Ryanair’s website contained misleading messages that discredited eDreams and its Prime subscription program. Among the false claims were allegations that eDreams advertised discounts which were not real, and that customers booking through the platform would face complications such as denied boarding. The ruling declared these statements to be both inaccurate and disparaging to eDreams’ business reputation.
eDreams Prime Legitimacy Defended in Court
According to the court ruling, the eDreams Prime program offers legitimate discounts and customer benefits. Contrary to Ryanair’s accusations, the court validated that Prime members receive tangible price advantages compared to non-members. This official recognition supports eDreams’ position that its Prime service is a subscription-based offering designed to reward customer loyalty, not a pricing gimmick.
The Prime program allows members access to lower fares, exclusive deals, and other travel-related perks. The court highlighted that membership terms are clearly outlined and disclosed during the booking process, including the option to cancel the subscription during a free trial period. These findings directly counter Ryanair’s narrative suggesting that customers were being deceived.
Mandatory Retraction and Website Correction
As part of the judgment, Ryanair has been ordered to publish the ruling on its website for one full month. This includes a public notice declaring that its previous statements about eDreams and Prime discounts were false and misleading. Additionally, the court has mandated the removal of any content that falsely accuses eDreams of improper conduct or discredits its services.
This requirement serves as a corrective measure and a deterrent against future dissemination of false information. By obliging Ryanair to acknowledge its wrongdoing in a public manner, the court aims to restore trust and transparency for consumers navigating online travel booking platforms.
History of Legal Battles Between the Two Companies
This isn’t the first time Ryanair has been held legally accountable for its approach toward online travel agencies. In 2017, the Barcelona Commercial Court ruled that the airline had to stop making defamatory statements about eDreams. In 2023, the Provincial Court of Madrid reaffirmed the legitimacy of Prime discounts, underlining the value and transparency of eDreams’ services.
The current judgment builds on this legal history by reinforcing the principle that competitive disagreements must not resort to disinformation or unfair practices. It underscores the legal limitations around public communications, especially when those communications impact the reputations of other businesses and mislead customers in the process.
Impact on Travelers and the Broader Travel Industry
The outcome of this case is likely to resonate across the travel industry. For consumers, it’s a reminder of the importance of transparency and legal accountability in digital commerce. For businesses, it is a stark warning that competition must remain within the bounds of fair marketing and factual accuracy.
eDreams ODIGEO operates across 44 markets worldwide and serves over 20 million customers annually through its brands including eDreams, Opodo, GO Voyages, and Travellink. With over 5 million Prime members globally, the company has invested significantly in subscription-based services as a strategic growth pillar.
The ruling serves as legal affirmation that eDreams’ digital model is both valid and protected under Spanish and EU law. It also sends a clear message to industry players that allegations and advertising must be rooted in fact, not strategy-driven misrepresentation.
Do you think court rulings like this influence how you book travel online? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
