Travellers heading to Bucharest in 2026 will face a new nightly tourist tax after the city approved a flat-rate levy designed to fund tourism promotion in the Romanian capital.
The General Council Municipality of Bucharest adopted the measure on 23 December, just days after publishing a draft proposal, despite objections from the hotel industry and warnings about a lack of transparency.
From next year, visitors staying overnight in Bucharest will be charged 10 Romanian Leu (around €2) per night, regardless of the type or price of accommodation. City officials expect the tax to generate 15 million Romanian Leu annually (approximately €2.9 million). Still, industry groups argue there is no clear plan for how the funds will be spent.
How Bucharest’s new tourist tax will work
The levy will apply to all tourists staying in paid accommodation across the city, including hotels, short-term rentals, and properties booked through online platforms such as Airbnb and Booking.com. The tax will be collected directly by accommodation providers, booking platforms, or travel agencies, rather than paid separately by visitors.
Unlike tourist taxes in many European cities, Bucharest’s charge will not vary based on hotel category, room price, or location. Every visitor will pay the same amount per night. This structure has drawn criticism from hotel operators who argue that flat-rate levies disproportionately affect budget travellers and lower-cost accommodation.
Local media reports that penalties will apply for non-compliance. Individuals who fail to pay the levy could face fines of up to 1,500 Romanian Leu (€294), while businesses that do not collect or pass on the tax could be fined up to 4,000 Romanian Leu (€785).
City officials have defended the move as a necessary step to boost Bucharest’s visibility as a destination. Deputy Mayor Stelian Bujduveanu said the tax will bring “added value” to the city through promotions and events intended to benefit tourism and the wider region.
Why the hotel industry is pushing back
The speed with which the tax was approved has become a central point of contention. The Federation of the Romanian Hotel Industry (FIHR) has criticised the measure for being rushed through in what it describes as a non-transparent process, leaving little opportunity for consultation with businesses that will be responsible for collecting the levy.
Hotel operators argue that while investing in destination marketing is essential, Bucharest risks damaging its competitiveness if new costs are imposed without a clear strategy. The city has recently seen growing international interest, driven in part by viral social media attention around attractions such as its large thermal spa complex, which has boosted visitor numbers and raised Bucharest’s profile as a city-break destination.
According to the FIHR, introducing a new tax without a defined promotional roadmap could undermine that momentum. Industry leaders warn that Bucharest could become an expensive destination that remains poorly marketed, reducing the value of the levy for both visitors and local businesses.
“Tourism needs partnership, not administrative improvisation,” the FIHR said, calling for closer cooperation between city authorities and the private sector when shaping tourism policy.
The debate reflects a wider tension playing out across European cities, where tourist taxes are increasingly used to fund promotion, infrastructure, and visitor management. While such levies are standard in destinations from Paris to Rome, they are often tied to accommodation prices or earmarked for clearly defined projects, something critics say is missing in Bucharest’s approach.
For travellers, the immediate financial impact will be modest, with the €2-per-night charge unlikely to deter most visitors on its own. However, the controversy surrounding the tax raises broader questions about how cities balance the cost of tourism growth with transparency, accountability, and collaboration with the businesses that host visitors.
As Bucharest prepares for the 2026 rollout, both travellers and the tourism industry will be watching closely to see whether the promised benefits of the levy materialise — and whether the funds collected translate into tangible improvements that enhance the city’s appeal rather than simply adding another line to a hotel bill.
Photo Credit: f11photo / Shutterstock.com
